{"id":8380,"date":"2011-08-19T23:34:46","date_gmt":"2011-08-20T03:34:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=8380"},"modified":"2014-01-01T11:53:52","modified_gmt":"2014-01-01T16:53:52","slug":"dog-days-2-rights-and-wrongs","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/2011\/08\/19\/dog-days-2-rights-and-wrongs\/","title":{"rendered":"Dog Days (2): Rights \u2014 and Wrongs"},"content":{"rendered":"<div id=\"attachment_8493\" style=\"width: 253px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-8493\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-8493  \" title=\"ADC_with_dinosaur_8-18-2011\" alt=\"A. D. Coleman with dinosaur, self-portrait, 8-18-2011.\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/ADC_with_dinosaur_8-18-20113-300x225.jpg\" width=\"243\" height=\"183\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/ADC_with_dinosaur_8-18-20113-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/ADC_with_dinosaur_8-18-20113-150x112.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/ADC_with_dinosaur_8-18-20113-400x300.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/ADC_with_dinosaur_8-18-20113.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 243px) 100vw, 243px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-8493\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A. D. Coleman with dinosaur, self-portrait, 8-18-2011.<\/p><\/div>\n<p>My decision to out one\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=8233\">IP reiver<\/a>\u00a0and one\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=8369\">enabler of IP reivers<\/a> has evoked a mini-flashmob response. In addition to <a href=\"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=8369#newberry\">Kyle Newberry&#8217;s jejune, derogatory email to me<\/a> on this subject, describing me as &#8220;dinosaur bones,&#8221; this blog has received equally nyahnyah-level comments from other GenTweet visitors who, significantly, lack the courage to identify themselves publicly. Not a portent of worse to come, I hope, though perhaps I risk precipitating that simply by annotating the phenomenon here.<\/p>\n<p>As a matter of editorial policy I don&#8217;t allow anonymous or pseudonymous commenting at this site, as I indicate in <a href=\"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?page_id=616\">&#8220;Comments: Editorial Policy.&#8221;<\/a>\u00a0<em>Photocritic International<\/em>&#8216;s comment space is reserved for those adults with enough understanding of citizenly responsibility to put their real full names on their comments, thereby making themselves publicly and professionally accountable for their own words, just as I do. Refusal to abide by this rule usually gets such comments relegated to the WordPress trash bin. Beyond that, as indicated on that same protocol page, &#8220;If you think someone\u2019s wrong (myself included), prove it with reasoned argument. . . .\u00a0Make your comment, even if brief, a contribution to the discussion. Add some pertinent information, relate an illustrative personal anecdote, explore another aspect of the question under consideration.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Here, in their entirety, are two examples of the incoming GenTweet blather:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>From &#8220;yourmom&#8221;: &#8220;omg seriously dude, WHO CARES&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>omg seriously dude, this blog has received over one million pageviews since its June 2009 debut. Awesome! omg seriously dude, this suggests that the majority of those who visit here and read the content actually care about the issues raised, the substantive discussions thereof that I post, and the usually thoughtful commentary thereon supplied by my readers. omg seriously dude, visitors to this site come here by choice, and opt to put their real names on their comments, so feel free to take your traffic, and your need to hide behind a fake name, elsewhere. omg seriously dude, either man up or shut up.\u00a0Totally! LMAO :&gt;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>From &#8220;Kate&#8221;: &#8220;You are a pompous asshole. Posting his email on your blog to poke fun at him is very tacky.&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>What&#8217;s very tacky, &#8220;Kate,&#8221; is Kyle Newberry, a total stranger to me, deciding, in response to a published argument I&#8217;ve made at my blog, that he&#8217;s entitled to send me a snotty private email consisting of a three-word put-down, with impunity. What&#8217;s very tacky is\u00a0your conviction that someone who behaves like that doesn&#8217;t thereby void the right to privacy I&#8217;d otherwise accord to email correspondence. What&#8217;s very tacky is you hiding behind the anonymity of your first-name-only identity while seeking to make an insulting public comment on the public position taken by an identified, long-established professional in a field in which you have no credibility, reputation, or accomplishment.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-8598\" title=\"Kate_Wright_tweet_1-21-11\" alt=\"Kate Wright tweet, 1-21-11\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_1-21-113.jpg\" width=\"470\" height=\"65\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_1-21-113.jpg 470w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_1-21-113-300x41.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_1-21-113-150x20.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_1-21-113-400x55.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 470px) 100vw, 470px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>So let me give you a public face as well. A bit of online sleuthing yields up the info that you&#8217;re one Kate Wright, an &#8220;English transplant living in NYC&#8221; \u2014 Park Slope, Brooklyn, to be precise \u2014 and that you &#8220;like deer, books, photography, tattoos, fashion, design, movies, music, TED, dogs and BBC Radio 4.&#8221; With a <a href=\"http:\/\/twitter.com\/#!\/shesbenevolent\" target=\"_blank\">Twitter account<\/a>\u00a0under the username &#8220;shesbenevolent&#8221;\u00a0and a <a href=\"http:\/\/shesbenevolent.tumblr.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Tumblr account titled &#8220;No Help For That&#8221;<\/a>\u00a0\u2014 which, even combined for maximum aggregate content, provide no reason whatsoever for anyone to take your opinion seriously on any subject.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-8587\" title=\"Kate_Wright_tweet_7-11-11\" alt=\"Kate Wright tweet, 7-11-11\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_7-11-113.jpg\" width=\"450\" height=\"78\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_7-11-113.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_7-11-113-300x52.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_7-11-113-150x26.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_7-11-113-400x69.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 450px) 100vw, 450px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>They do, however, offer up what you clearly consider to be utterly fascinating insights into your whereabouts from hour to hour and your tastes in nail polish, hand cream, tattoos, and trendy outfits. And toilets. Sample tweet from you, dated August 1, 2011:\u00a0&#8220;Bryant Park officially has my favorite toilets. It has automized toilet seat covers. They&#8217;re my favorite. And classical music. And flowers.&#8221; (Talk about a pompous asshole, literally. As &#8220;yourmom&#8221; might say,\u00a0omg seriously dudette, WHO CARES about your thunderpot preferences? ROFL :&gt;)<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"Kate Wright tweet, 8-4-11(b)\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-8466\" title=\"Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-11(b)\" alt=\"Kate Wright tweet, 8-4-11(b)\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-11b3.jpg\" width=\"426\" height=\"72\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-11b3.jpg 525w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-11b3-300x50.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-11b3-150x25.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-11b3-400x67.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 426px) 100vw, 426px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Another sample tweet from you, dated August 4, 2011: &#8220;When I&#8217;m buzzed\/drunk, I think I have a large quantity of profound\/enlightening thoughts. I should start recording them and checking later.&#8221; An epochal experiment, with a surely breathless world awaiting the definitely unpredictable outcome.\u00a0You go, girl. But please, Your Benevolency,\u00a0spare me, and my readers, the results, and any more of your largesse. TIA.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-8442\" title=\"Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-11\" alt=\"Kate Wright tweet, 8-4-11\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-113.jpg\" width=\"467\" height=\"100\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-113.jpg 519w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-113-300x64.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-113-150x32.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_8-4-113-400x85.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 467px) 100vw, 467px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>As should be obvious to even the most casual visitor, I don&#8217;t produce this blog for dumb-and-dumber types who call people &#8220;dude&#8221; and think suckxmyxkiss@yourserverhere.com is a clever email address, nor for self-absorbed Brit-twit fashionista wannabes convinced the world takes an interest in where they shit. How on earth did these clueless twerps find their way here? Are they Kyle Newberry&#8217;s kneecap specialists? Another mystery of the intertubes.\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.varchive.org\/\" target=\"_blank\">Immanuel Velikovsky<\/a>\u00a0was right:\u00a0See what disasters can ensue when universes of discourse, definitely not parallel, collide?<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-8599\" title=\"Kate_Wright_tweet_11-25-10\" alt=\"Kate Wright tweet, 11-25-10\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_11-25-103.jpg\" width=\"462\" height=\"97\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_11-25-103.jpg 513w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_11-25-103-300x63.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_11-25-103-150x31.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Kate_Wright_tweet_11-25-103-400x84.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 462px) 100vw, 462px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u2022<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Speaking of Twitter, and IP rights, the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bjp-online.com\/british-journal-of-photography\/news\/2102359\/mail-online-accused-infringing-photographers-copyright\" target=\"_blank\"><em>British Journal of Photography<\/em> reports<\/a> that &#8220;Alice Taylor, an amateur photographer, has accused Mail Online of using her images without authorisation, and published on her blog a series of emails she exchanged with one of the\u00a0paper&#8217;s\u00a0picture editors.&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/ushome\/index.html\" target=\"_blank\">Mail Online<\/a> is the web version of the <em>Daily Mail<\/em>, a British daily print tabloid. Taylor had posted her images of mannikins, made in a Gap store, at her Twitter blog, where &#8220;a picture desk staffer [at Mail Online] named Ariel Ramerez&#8221; found them.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Ramerez solicited permission to use the images in Mail Online. Taylor granted permission, contingent on a donation of 250 GBP (about USD $414) to her favorite charity. Ramerez demurred, and Taylor refused permission. Upon which Mail Online proceeded to use the images anyway. That&#8217;s crowdsourcing with a vengeance. Here&#8217;s the evidence:<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_8544\" style=\"width: 439px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-8544\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-8544 \" title=\"Mail_Online_IP_piracy\" alt=\"Mail Online IP piracy, 8-15-11\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Mail_Online_IP_piracy3.jpg\" width=\"429\" height=\"450\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Mail_Online_IP_piracy3.jpg 477w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Mail_Online_IP_piracy3-286x300.jpg 286w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Mail_Online_IP_piracy3-143x150.jpg 143w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Mail_Online_IP_piracy3-400x419.jpg 400w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 429px) 100vw, 429px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-8544\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Mail Online IP piracy, 8-15-11<\/p><\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Taylor complained, and they&#8217;ve since removed the entire page, leaving only <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/femail\/article-2026313\/Gap-Always-Skinny-denim-Bloggers-spark-fury-anorexic-looking-mannequin.html\" target=\"_blank\">an error message<\/a> for anyone who seeks it out. Clearly an admission of guilt. Presumably, caught red-handed in blatant infringement of copyright, they&#8217;ll now have to pay Taylor a good bit more than she asked originally. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wonderlandblog.com\/wonderland\/2011\/08\/the-daily-mail-knowingly-and-commercially-used-my-photos-despite-my-denying-them-permission.html\" target=\"_blank\">Taylor has documented all this at her blog, Wonderland<\/a>, complete with her email exchanges with Ramerez. These make it abundantly clear that Ramerez understood Taylor had turned him down, but <del>didn&#8217;t let that deter him in the least.<\/del> that didn&#8217;t deter\u00a0<em>Mail Online<\/em> in the least.<strong>*<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">This shameless if small-scale looting pales, of course, when compared to the massive invasions of privacy systematically and gleefully engaged in by Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s goon squads at a competing publication. Just more evidence that the sliminess of the UK&#8217;s tabloid press doesn&#8217;t end at the edges of Murdoch&#8217;s empire, but manifests itself on every level of operation, including the acquisition of picture rights by any means necessary.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">My correspondent\u00a0\u00a0&#8220;yourmom&#8221; will doubtless send Taylor an &#8220;omg seriously dude, WHO CARES&#8221; email, mandated by his conceptual rigor, while Kate Wright will most assuredly condemn Taylor as &#8220;very tacky&#8221; for having the temerity to post Ramerez&#8217;s emails on her blog \u2014 Wright&#8217;s keen sense of intellectual integrity requires nothing less. As for me, I offer Taylor my wholehearted congratulations. Soak &#8217;em for all they&#8217;re worth, and embarrass them as well.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Not the first time for the <em>Daily Mail<\/em> to get caught stealing images, by the way. See\u00a0Olivier Laurent&#8217;s November 26, 2010 story in the BJP, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bjp-online.com\/british-journal-of-photography\/news\/1899789\/daily-mail-accused-copyright-infringement\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Daily Mail apologises for image&#8217;s misuse.&#8221;<\/a>\u00a0Laurent&#8217;s story discusses a then-recent instance, but contains synopses of two other cases of <em>Daily Mail<\/em> appropriation of photographers&#8217; work in 2010. Looks like a pattern to me. The <em>Daily Mail<\/em>\u2019s online picture editor Elliot Wagland claims that such occurrences are accidents. Is he lying, or simply incompetent? You decide.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><em><strong>*<\/strong> Note, January 1, 2014: A source who wishes to remain anonymous informs me that the decision to use Taylor&#8217;s images without her permission came not from Ramerez but from a higher authority. I can&#8217;t verify this;\u00a0picture editor Stefan Jeremiah told Taylor only that unattributed\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wonderlandblog.com\/wonderland\/2011\/08\/the-daily-mail-knowingly-and-commercially-used-my-photos-despite-my-denying-them-permission.html\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;human error&#8221; caused this breach<\/a>. (They finally settled with her for\u00a0for \u00a32000, paid to charities of her choosing.) However, given the possibility that Ramerez had no role in this beyond the initial query to Taylor, I&#8217;m revising that line in this post, with an apology to Ramerez if otherwise credible reports in the press led me to misrepresent his accountability in this situation.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u2022<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-8543\" title=\"Entertainment_Law_logo\" alt=\"Entertainment Law logo\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Entertainment-Law_logo3-300x300.png\" width=\"144\" height=\"144\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Entertainment-Law_logo3-300x300.png 300w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Entertainment-Law_logo3-150x150.png 150w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Entertainment-Law_logo3-400x400.png 400w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/08\/Entertainment-Law_logo3.png 750w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 144px) 100vw, 144px\" \/>Interesting always to learn that, in addition to the occasional stray babe in the woods, I have sophisticated readers in unexpected fields. A recent WordPress pingback shows me that Gordon P. Firemark, Esq., who publishes the\u00a0Entertainment Law Update and does its accompanying podcasts, linked to <a title=\"Copyright for All Primates?\" href=\"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=8129\">my post on the Macaque monkey self-portraits<\/a> in his most recent post, <a href=\"http:\/\/firemark.com\/2011\/08\/18\/entertainment-law-update-episode-monkeying-around-copyright-law\/\" target=\"_blank\">&#8220;Episode 023 \u2013 Monkeying around with copyright law.&#8221;<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Firemark&#8217;s a specialist, of course, but these issues affect photographers and makers of IP at all levels, from amateurs like Taylor on up. Only those subsidized by trust funds or rich spouses or academic sinecures or well-paid fulltime staff positions with benefits can afford the luxury of the &#8220;who cares?&#8221; attitude toward intellectual property rights and violations thereof. And that doesn&#8217;t entitle them to a &#8220;let them eat cake&#8221; response to the objections of those us who produce IP, for whom copyright, and the\u00a0control and licensing of our IP rights it enables, are crucial to financial survival \u2014 now more than ever.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As should be obvious to even the most casual visitor, I don&#8217;t produce this blog for dumb-and-dumber types who call people &#8220;dude&#8221; and think suckxmyxkiss@yourserverhere.com is a clever email address, nor for self-absorbed Brit-twit fashionista wannabes convinced the world takes an interest in where they shit. How on earth did these twerps find their way here? Another mystery of the intertubes. Immanuel Velikovsky was right: See what can happen when universes of discourse, definitely not parallel, collide? [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[7,13],"tags":[33,52,137,213,271,285,318],"class_list":["post-8380","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digital-technology","category-intellectual-property-2","tag-alice-taylor","tag-ariel-ramerez","tag-daily-mail","tag-gordon-firemark","tag-kate-wright","tag-kyle-newberry","tag-mail-online","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8380"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8380\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8380"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8380"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}