{"id":23446,"date":"2015-03-15T23:48:41","date_gmt":"2015-03-16T03:48:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=23446"},"modified":"2015-04-01T23:48:16","modified_gmt":"2015-04-02T03:48:16","slug":"alternate-history-robert-capa-john-morris-and-the-nppa-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/2015\/03\/15\/alternate-history-robert-capa-john-morris-and-the-nppa-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Alternate History: Robert Capa, John Morris, and the NPPA (1)"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"A.<\/a>Those who have followed this series on Robert Capa’s D-Day images and their subsequent fate<\/a> will recall that, on June 27, 2014 I mailed to Sean D. Elliott, Ethics Committee Chairman<\/a> of the National Press Photographers Association<\/a>, a formal complaint about the deceptions embedded in John Morris’s longstanding narrative of Capa’s D-Day (and in the then-recent TIME\/Magnum video<\/a> that reiterated that fiction), naming also those other individuals and institutions who have conspired with him to sustain this myth, including Cynthia Young, current curator of the Robert Capa and Cornell Capa Archive at the International Center of Photography.<\/p>\n

\"National<\/a>That the NPPA’s Ethics Committee can act expeditiously we know from its rapid response to World Press Photo’s recent rejection of 20 percent of entries to its annual contest for excessive digital alteration. Within days of the announcement of that WPP decision, the Ethics Committee released a statement<\/a>, following that up with the announcement of a joint WPP\/NPPA symposium<\/a> to explore the issues.<\/p>\n

Yet my filing of that complaint<\/a> almost nine months ago has evoked no response whatsoever from the NPPA; indeed, they have yet to show me the courtesy of acknowledging receipt thereof. (Should they attempt to deny receipt, here’s the USPS tracking information<\/a>.) But I took the further precaution of emailing it to Elliott and also to Donald R. Winslow<\/a> of the NPPA, who edits that professional organization’s magazine and website, while also posting it at this blog. Reports of my filing of the complaint appeared shortly thereafter at the Poynter Institute’s blog<\/a> and on PetaPixel<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\"John<\/a>

John Morris on Christiane Amanpour’s CNN show, 11-11-14, screenshot<\/p><\/div>\n

I therefore consider it highly unlikely that anyone in the NPPA’s administration hadn’t heard of this challenge to the Capa D-Day fable till the Christiane Amanpour interview with John Morris<\/a> aired on November 11. So, on December 27, six months after I filed my formal complaint, and six weeks after Morris used his CNN appearance to revise radically his account of what happened to Capa’s films in LIFE<\/em>‘s London darkroom on June 6, 1944, I drafted the following, toward a future post:<\/p>\n

\"NPPA<\/a>

NPPA editor Donald R. Winslow, Facebook response to CNN interview with John Morris, 11-14-14<\/p><\/div>\n

Hot on the heels of that CNN broadcast, NPPA editor-in-chief Donald Winslow posted on his own Facebook page<\/a> \u2014 which feeds into the organization’s Facebook page \u2014 the following comment: “WTF?!?!?!? Former Picture Editor John G. Morris tells Christiane Amanpour that Capa’s ‘lost’ images may never have been shot.”<\/em><\/p>\n

He posted a similar but slightly less pungent variant on Twitter<\/a> the same day: “Former Picture Editor John G. Morris tells Christiane Amanpour that Capa’s ‘lost’ images may never have been shot.”<\/em><\/p>\n

Apparently, Winslow and the NPPA want to pretend that the Amanpour segment on CNN marks the first time this came to their attention, and the moment this story went public. But I’m afraid that blatant con job simply won’t work. Morris’s first public recantation of the emulsion-melt narrative took place at this blog, in a Q&A published on August 3, 2014: “It appears now that I was simply mistaken about the ‘melting.'”<\/em><\/p>\n

And I see no reason to assume that this attempted deception starts and ends with Winslow, when in all likelihood it goes all the way up the NPPA food chain \u2014 straight to its board of directors. This represents a policy decision, not a unapproved operation by underlings. These are apparatchiks acting on orders from above.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

\"Donald<\/a>

Donald Winslow, Twitter comment, 11-14-14<\/p><\/div>\n

I’m no fan of the NPPA, having in December 2012 cited John Long, at that time the organization\u2019s Ethics Committee\u00a0Chair<\/a>, as a sanctimonious hypocrite. Even so, I wouldn’t have expected such abjectly chickenshit behavior from the NPPA. Color me excruciatingly na\u00efve. I have nothing but contempt for the entire lot of them, from President Mark Dolan on down. I’ll exempt the rank and file; from the evidence, much gets said and done in their name on which they’re not consulted and about which they’re not notified.<\/em><\/p>\n

The hierarchy has ignored my formal complaint for six months; I guarantee they’ll take no action on it. And I’ll give you 10-to-1\u00a0odds that, if they ever do address this investigation publicly, they’ll kiss up to Morris, Magnum, the ICP, and everyone else involved, excusing all their falsehoods and deceptions, whitewashing the whole Capa industry. In the best interests of their membership, they won’t risk alienating influential picture agencies, publishers, museums, picture editors, and curators by biting the hands that feed them.<\/em><\/p>\n

Mark my words: From the NPPA’s administration on down through the general membership, they know which side their bread is buttered on. Thus commerce doth make cowards of us all.<\/em><\/p>\n

With posts on other subjects scheduled, I set that prognosis aside for subsequent review. We’ll learn shortly how my prediction played out.<\/p>\n

The Loud Silence
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

The explanation for this organization’s turning a blind eye to the accumulated evidence may lie in the fact that the NPPA has a relationship to former LIFE<\/em> picture editor John Morris that one would have to describe as anything but impartial. An NPPA Life Member<\/a>, Morris in 1971 received the organization’s Joseph A. Sprague Memorial Award<\/a> (established in 1949), which the NPPA describes, arguably, as “the highest honor in the field of photojournalism.” He’s written for News Photographer<\/em> magazine and served as faculty in the NPPA’s annual “Flying Short Course.”<\/p>\n

At its website, the NPPA refers to Morris regularly in adulatory tones as “legendary photography editor,”<\/a> “the legend of photojournalism,”<\/a> “photojournalism’s living legend,”<\/a> “the undisputed dean of photojournalism,”<\/a> “the eminence gris [sic] of picture editors,”<\/a> and so on. His second wife, Margaret “Midge” Morris, who died in 1981, served as the editor of the NPPA’s News Photographer<\/em> magazine<\/a> from 1974 through 1976.<\/p>\n

\"Overseas<\/a>

Overseas Press Club logo<\/p><\/div>\n

The NPPA also celebrates whenever one of its members receives the Robert Capa Award <\/a>from the Overseas Press Club or the Infinity Award<\/a> from the International Center of Photography. (In a May 23, 2008 obituary, “Cornell Capa, 90, Dies In New York,”<\/a> they describe the ICP’s founder as “[t]he younger brother of infamous [sic] war photographer Robert Capa” \u2014 an infelicitous choice of words, surely.) The NPPA’s connection to the Robert Capa legend thus runs deep, another possible reason for its reluctance to question that myth.<\/p>\n

Another County Heard From<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"Donald<\/a>

Donald Winslow, NPPA, announcement of Jan-Feb 2015 issue of News Photographer, Facebook, 3-13-15<\/p><\/div>\n

Now the NPPA has at long last broken its silence on this matter, not by responding to my formal complaint but by publishing a story on this investigation in the January-February 2015 print edition of its official journal, News Photographer<\/em>, and posting it in the digital edition thereof <\/a>at the NPPA’s website. Both are available exclusively to members or subscribers, so I can’t enable your access thereto, alas \u2014 even though, in his March 13 Facebook announcement of the issue, Winslow claims boldly that it provides “the final word on Robert Capa’s D-Day negatives and the mystery of 11 images.”<\/p>\n

\"NPPA<\/a>

NPPA News Photographer, January-February 2015, cover<\/p><\/div>\n

In fact, at the moment I can’t even quote therefrom. Notwithstanding the fact that this article premises itself on the extensive research conducted and published at this blog, and despite my having provided that article’s author, Bruce Young, with extensive, detailed responses to a set of questions he posed to me via email, editor Winslow has refused to provide me or Ross Baughman (whose June 6, 2014 Guest Post<\/a> here kicked off this inquiry, and who also answered questions from Young at length) either a PDF of the published version or access to the online version. In fact, the NPPA’s Professional Services Director, Thomas Kenniff, informed Baughman that if we wanted to read the article we’d have to purchase copies of the print edition.<\/p>\n

Subsequently they relented on that last matter \u2014 perhaps some vestige of basic good manners and reciprocal professional courtesy kicked in. So a complimentary copy will wend its way to me via snail-mail (with the emphasis on snail<\/em>, I suspect), and presumably another to Baughman. While it makes its way here I’ll provide some backstory, to contextualize my eventual comments on the piece, forthcoming once I get to read and evaluate it. (No doubt Winslow will preface the feature with full disclosure of those allegiances enumerated above.)<\/p>\n

\u2022<\/p>\n

Here’s this in-house journal’s self-description, as published at the website<\/a>:<\/p>\n

“<\/em>News Photographer magazine supports the efforts of the National Press Photographers Association in its role as the voice of the photojournalist by communicating news, identifying trends, delineating issues, and providing information, and recognizing the work of photojournalists. The columns and articles that appear in the monthly magazine are often cited as ‘the authority’ on topics ranging from law and ethics to technology.”<\/em><\/p>\n

\"NPPA<\/a>

NPPA “News Photographer” magazine self-description, screenshot<\/p><\/div>\n

Notwithstanding its claim to function as “the authority” on those matters (for which they provide no supporting evidence \u2014 I’ve never seen it referred to as such), the magazine circulates almost exclusively to the NPPA’s membership.<\/p>\n

Airing and Pairing<\/strong><\/p>\n

“By airing deceptive claims and pairing them with opposing claims, the journalist leaves open the question of where the truth lies. … Faced with contrasting claims, people tend to pick the more agreeable one, even when it’s factually less plausible.”<\/em> \u2014 Thomas E. Patterson, Informing the News: The Need for Knowledge-Based Journalism<\/em> (Vintage Books, 2013), p. 48<\/p>\n

\"nppa_grady_logo\"<\/a>The NPPA’s current move of its headquarters to the University of Georgia’s Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication<\/a> embeds the organization within a highly reputed undergraduate and graduate academic program for journalism in general. Moreover, it affiliates the NPPA with such other distinguished organizations housed at Grady as the\u00a0Georgia Scholastic Press Association<\/a> for high-school journalists, the college’s own\u00a0Management Seminar for College Newspaper Editors<\/a> and its\u00a0New Media Institute<\/a>, the James M. Cox Jr. Center for International Mass Communication Training and Research<\/a>, the Center for Health and Risk Communication<\/a>, and the George Foster Peabody Awards<\/a>, the most prestigious award in electronic journalism.<\/p>\n

\"Donald<\/a>

Donald R. Winslow, NPPA official portrait<\/p><\/div>\n

The official journal of any organization joining such august company must have, as its editor, someone cognizant of the expectations of those in the vanguard of the field of journalism as a whole. Winslow, who\u00a0has served as the NPPA’s publications editor since 2003, can hardly claim ignorance of the discreditation of the “he said, she said” model by prominent figures in journalism. Surely, as a 2011 recipient<\/a> of\u00a0the organization’s Joseph A. Sprague Memorial Award<\/a> (established in 1949) \u2014 which the NPPA describes, arguably, as “the highest honor in the field of photojournalism” \u2014\u00a0Winslow qualifies as au courant<\/em> in that regard.<\/p>\n

Thus we must consider Winslow’s decision to employ a suspect journalistic approach for this particular article, and his choice of writer to practice it on this set of issues, as calculated, not inadvertent, and definitely not ignorant or uninformed. I’ll elaborate on the discredited “he said, she said” model Winslow required of the writer in my next post<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u2022<\/p>\n

(For an index of links to all posts in this series,\u00a0click here<\/a>.)<\/p>\n

\u2022<\/p>\n

This post supported by a donation from the 20 x 24 Studio<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

We must consider the decision by Donald R. Winslow of the National Press Photographers Aassociation (NPPA) to employ a suspect journalistic approach for this particular article \u2014 the discredited “he said, she said” model \u2014 and his choice of writer to practice it on this set of issues as calculated, not inadvertent, and definitely not ignorant or uninformed. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[788,945,946],"tags":[1047,1041,1045,1046,938,731,937,1061],"class_list":["post-23446","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-analog-photography-2","category-photo-history","category-photojournalism-2","tag-bruce-young","tag-christiane-amanpour","tag-donald-r-winslow","tag-grady-college-of-journalism-and-mass-communication","tag-john-morris","tag-national-press-photographers-association-nppa","tag-robert-capa","tag-university-of-georgia","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23446","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=23446"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23446\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=23446"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=23446"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=23446"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}