{"id":2262,"date":"2009-12-14T22:43:24","date_gmt":"2009-12-15T02:43:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=2262"},"modified":"2009-12-14T22:43:24","modified_gmt":"2009-12-15T02:43:24","slug":"polaroid-collection-update-11","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/2009\/12\/14\/polaroid-collection-update-11\/","title":{"rendered":"Polaroid Collection: Update 11"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Where Are the Missing 8000 Pieces from the Polaroid Collection? (continued)<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\"><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\"><em><span style=\"color: #000000;\">As I pointed out in <\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"color: #000000;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=1923\">my previous post<\/a><\/span><\/em><em><span style=\"color: #000000;\">, somehow, between early 2003 and early 2009, one-third of the Polaroid Collection, some 6000-8000 items, went astray. That\u2019s more than a minor shortfall, or a glitch in the inventory process.\u00a0Where are they?<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_2311\" style=\"width: 220px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.flickr.com\/photos\/timmythesuk\/326449313\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2311\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-2311   \" title=\"326449313_cf78dbe4c7\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/326449313_cf78dbe4c74-300x263.jpg\" alt=\"Polaroid Big Shot, 1971-73\" width=\"210\" height=\"184\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/326449313_cf78dbe4c74-300x263.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/326449313_cf78dbe4c74-150x131.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/326449313_cf78dbe4c74-400x351.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/326449313_cf78dbe4c74.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 210px) 100vw, 210px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2311\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Polaroid Big Shot, 1971-73<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A few partial answers propose themselves:<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\">I have it on good authority that, upon the dissolution of the original Polaroid Corporation, assorted executives ended up (inadvertently, I\u2019m sure) packing the original prints from the collection that decorated their office walls in with their personal effects and papers and taking them home. That\u2019s to be expected, if not endorsed, and it surely accounts for some of the \u201cshrinkage\u201d the collection underwent.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\">Amplifying that scenario, aggravating the situation, and perhaps explaining the fate of some more of the disappeared works, the outcome of the initial 2002 bankruptcy proceeding had stiffed a considerable number of ex-employees, all at once. \u201cThe company has had sweeping layoffs and has discontinued some severance payments. And three days before its filing, it terminated retiree health benefits,\u201d according to Kris Frieswick\u2019s January 1, 2003\u00a0summary for\u00a0<em>CFO Magazine<\/em>,\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.cfo.com\/article.cfm\/3007726\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cWhat\u2019s Wrong with This Picture? Polaroid\u2019s passage through Chapter 11 exposes how bankruptcy can give debtors too much power.\u201d<\/a> A large cohort of disgruntled, pink-slipped personnel, abruptly stripped of severance pay, retirement benefits, and other protections, might well decide to augment their radically slimmed termination packages with a few choice pieces of art each as supplementary compensation.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Polaroid_Corporation\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-2314\" title=\"230px-Polaroid_logo.svg\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/230px-Polaroid_logo.svg_4.png\" alt=\"230px-Polaroid_logo.svg\" width=\"230\" height=\"45\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/230px-Polaroid_logo.svg_4.png 230w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/230px-Polaroid_logo.svg_4-150x29.png 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 230px) 100vw, 230px\" \/><\/a>But 6000-8000 pieces? That\u2019s not just some upper-echelon employees walking off with a few souvenirs from the offices. Nor is it middle-management and staff voting themselves an informal Christmas bonus. That\u2019s wholesale looting. Keep in mind that the Polaroid Collection wasn\u2019t just strewn around headquarters in open boxes, free for the taking. It was housed (so we have been told) in a secure, state-of-the-art facility in Waltham, MA, under the supervision of curator Barbara Hitchcock. (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dailynewstribune.com\/news\/x234225724\/German-bank-buys-back-Polaroid-site\" target=\"_blank\">That building, and the parcel of land on which it sits, has since been sold<\/a>, with the future undetermined for something else at the site. The collection is presently in storage in Somerville, MA, with Hitchcock an independent consultant thereto.)<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\">Let\u2019s now take a few steps back, to sketch a timeline of Polaroid\u2019s accounting for and inventory of the collection:<\/p>\n<ul style=\"margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; padding-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px;\">\n<li>In 1988, Andrew Eskind and the other editors of the second enlarged edition of the compilation <em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0783821492?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thenearbycafe-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0783821492\" target=\"_blank\">International Photography: Index to Photographers, Collections, and Exhibitions<\/a><\/em> asked Polaroid for a new list of its holdings. The &#8220;updated&#8221; listing returned to them included &#8220;the Polaroid Collection, the Polaroid Corporate Archives and a portion of the Polaroid International Collection,&#8221; according to Carol Buchman. (Buchman was Assistant to the Director of the Clarence Kennedy Gallery, Linda Benedict-Jones; that was where the collection was housed at the time.) This listing gave no indication of the number of prints by each photographer, simply using the # sign after a name to indicate that the holdings were &#8220;substantial.&#8221; <a href=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/Polaroid-Collection-1990-list4.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">The published directory in that 1990 edition lists, by my count, 369 names; here they are, as they appear in its pages.<\/a><\/li>\n<li>In 1993, Andrew Eskind and the other editors of the second enlarged edition of the compilation\u00a0<em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0783821492?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thenearbycafe-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0783821492\" target=\"_blank\">International Photography: Index to Photographers, Collections, and Exhibitions<\/a><\/em> asked Polaroid for an updated listing\u00a0of its holdings. What they received from Barbara Hitchcock, who had become the director of the collection, was apparently nothing new; <a href=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/12\/Polaroid-Collection-1995-list4.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">it&#8217;s the same list of 369 names. Here they are, as they appear in the pages of the 1995 edition.<\/a><\/li>\n<li>In 1998, Barbara Hitchcock, then curator of the Polaroid Collection, supplied\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/Polaroid_Collection_Hitchcock_Inventory_19984.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">a listing of 451 photographers in the Polaroid Collection<\/a> for the final print edition of\u00a0<em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/0783821492?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thenearbycafe-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=0783821492\" target=\"_blank\">International Photography: Index to Photographers, Collections, and Exhibitions<\/a><\/em> published that year by GK Hall. For motives on which I won\u2019t speculate, Polaroid and its counsel withheld that document from the Delaware Bankruptcy Court during the 2002 proceedings, though it would have been easy enough to provide it as evidence of the company\u2019s ongoing inventorying process. Whatever the reasons for keeping it from the court, the list includes the photographers\u2019 names but not the specific number of prints acquired from them for the collection.<\/li>\n<li>The published estimates of the collection\u2019s size run consistently between 20,000 and 24,000 from the late 1990s through at least 2006. For example, Jonathan Jones, writing for\u00a0<em>The Guardian<\/em> (UK) on\u00a0October 22,\u00a02001, pegs it at \u201csome 20,000 works\u201d in his article \u201c<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/culture\/2001\/oct\/22\/artsfeatures.warhol\" target=\"_blank\">Gone in a flash.\u201d<\/a> (Jones gives no indication of the source of this figure. Perhaps he was fulfilling the British mandate for conservativism in keeping his figure low.)<\/li>\n<li>In the article\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/articles.latimes.com\/2002\/jan\/06\/entertainment\/ca-reynolds6\" target=\"_blank\">\u201cInstant Culture for Sale,\u201d<\/a> published on January 6, 2002 by the\u00a0<em>Los Angeles Times<\/em>, Christopher Reynolds quotes Hitchcock\u00a0as saying, \u201cWe think we have somewhere in the vicinity of 24,000 photos.\u201d (This excellent piece includes a wealth of information, and is one of the earliest to inquire into the fate of the collection as a result of the original bankruptcy proceedings.)<\/li>\n<li>Hitchcock confirmed this estimate yet again in \u201cAfter Images: With Polaroid in Bankruptcy, Its Remarkable Collection of Photography is in Jeopardy,\u201d\u00a0a March 10, 2002 feature in the\u00a0<em>Boston Globe<\/em> by Christine Temin. Hitchcock reiterates the 24,000 figure \u201cby more than 1,000 artists\u201d here. The article also quotes William Wegman, \u201cwho was shocked to learn that the 20 or so of his works in the collection might go elsewhere. \u2018We were told they would never be sold,\u2019 says Wegman, who, however, has nothing to that effect in writing. \u2018Who would have thought that the company would be in such bad shape? This is disturbing because it\u2019s breaking a promise,\u2019 he adds.\u201d The article indicates that at that point Christie\u2019s was angling for the right to auction the collection. (<a href=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/08\/polaroid_collection4.pdf\" target=\"_self\">Sotheby&#8217;s would eventually beat them out for the dubious honor.<\/a>) Temin also reports on the inventorying process: \u201cCataloging at Polaroid, says Hitchcock, \u2018has been a project with too many cooks. There are errors in data, lapses in documentation, objects with the same accession numbers.\u2019 There\u2019s no complete inventory. There have been thefts and disappearances of works out on loan. There\u2019s still a file card system in place. Work on a database halted at the end of September [2001], when Hitchcock lost her three part-time paid interns.\u201d [Note: This article is online at the\u00a0<em><a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.boston.com\/search\/\" target=\"_blank\">Boston Globe<\/a><\/em> site and elsewhere, but available only by subscription.]<\/li>\n<div id=\"attachment_2182\" style=\"width: 100px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/americanperspectives4.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-2182\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2182\" title=\"americanperspectives\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/americanperspectives4.jpg\" alt=\"American Perspectives, 2000\" width=\"90\" height=\"101\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-2182\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">American Perspectives, 2000<\/p><\/div>\n<li><a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.bu.edu\/art\/webPages\/polaroidRelease.html\" target=\"_blank\">A fall 2002 press release from the Boston University Art Gallery<\/a> concerning their November 22, 2002-January 26, 2003\u00a0showing of \u201cAmerican Perspectives: Photographs from the Polaroid Collection,\u201d an exhibition curated in 2000 by Michiko Kasahara\u00a0of the Tokyo Metropolitan Museum of Photography, describes it as \u201ca cross-section of the historic 23,000-item Polaroid collection.\u201d Presumably these estimates all base themselves on figures given out by Polaroid itself.<\/li>\n<li>Mark Feeney\u2019s\u00a0<em>Boston Globe<\/em> review of the \u201cAmerican Perspectives\u201d show, \u201cInstant Gratification,\u201d published on November 22, 2002, includes the following: \u201cAs for its 23,000-photograph Polaroid Collection, \u2018we are going to keep it intact, and it will remain part of Polaroid for the foreseeable future,\u2019 says company vice-president Jim Landrigan.\u201d Assurances such as these certainly helped to lull the photo\/art community into a mistaken sense of confidence that no action was needed from those with work in the collection to protect their ongoing rights to access to their works. [Note: This article is also online at the\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.boston.com\/search\/\" target=\"_blank\">Boston Globe<\/a> site and elsewhere, but available only by subscription.]<\/li>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/Encyclopedia_of_20th_Century_Photography-14.jpg\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-2173\" title=\"Encyclopedia_of_20th_Century_Photography-1\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/11\/Encyclopedia_of_20th_Century_Photography-14-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"Encyclopedia_of_20th_Century_Photography-1\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<li>More recently, here\u2019s the\u00a0<em><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/1579583938?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thenearbycafe-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=1579583938\" target=\"_blank\">Encyclopedia of Twentieth-Century Photography, Volume 1 (A-F)<\/a><\/em>, edited by Lynne Warren (New York: Routledge, 2006), p. 338: \u201cThe two separate collections [U.S. and International] were combined in 1990 and the complete collection now holds more than 23,000 images by over 1,000 different artists.\u201d (From the chapter \u201cCorporate Collections,\u201d by noted appraiser\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.peneloped.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Penelope Dixon<\/a>.)<\/li>\n<li>In May 2007,\u00a0<em><a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.massartguide.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">MassArtGuide<\/a><\/em> published \u201cInstantly Collectible: The Polaroid Collection\u201d by Monika Burman,\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.massartguide.com\/editorials\/MAY2007Polaroid.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">an interview with\u00a0Hitchcock<\/a> in which she gave no estimate of the collection&#8217;s size but claimed that it included \u201cover 1500 artists.\u201d<\/li>\n<li>Somehow, then, between her 1998 list of photographers in the collection and her 2007 interview, Hitchcock\u2019s estimate of the number of photographers represented therein tripled, from 451 in \u201898 to \u201cover 1500\u2033 in \u201807. That\u2019s a startling jump in itself. Meanwhile, however, the number of works in the collection diminished dramatically during that same period, from Polaroid\u2019s own estimate of \u201cin excess of 24,000 items\u201d in 2002, reiterated\u00a0as recently as 2006, to its internal inventory of just under 16,000 as of spring 2009 \u2014 reduced by a third.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\">How could any of this get verified? <a href=\"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=1911\" target=\"_self\">As previously reported here<\/a>, according to Manfred Heiting, who directed the International Polaroid Collection from 1972-82, all documentation of the International Collection has ceased to exist. After Polaroid closed down the International Collection and Heiting was no longer in charge, he told me, the corporation authorized the disposal of all files relating to the approximately 5000 works contained therein. This means that the only documentation of the Polaroid Corporation\u2019s arrangements with the makers of those works acquired for the International Collection is whatever now remains in the makers\u2019 hands.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_571\" style=\"width: 263px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/gp\/product\/3836501899?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=thenearbycafe-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=9325&amp;creativeASIN=3836501899\" target=\"_blank\"><img decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-571\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-571\" title=\"cover_va_polaroid_book_25_0803271125_id_132703\" src=\"http:\/\/74.220.207.133\/~nearbyca\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/07\/cover_va_polaroid_book_25_0803271125_id_1327034-253x300.jpg\" alt=\"The Polaroid Book, Taschen, 2005\" width=\"253\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/07\/cover_va_polaroid_book_25_0803271125_id_1327034-253x300.jpg 253w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/07\/cover_va_polaroid_book_25_0803271125_id_1327034-126x150.jpg 126w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/07\/cover_va_polaroid_book_25_0803271125_id_1327034-400x474.jpg 400w, https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-content\/uploads\/2009\/07\/cover_va_polaroid_book_25_0803271125_id_1327034.jpg 480w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 253px) 100vw, 253px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-571\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Polaroid Book, Taschen, 2005<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The two collections, U.S. and International, were then &#8220;merged,&#8221; which appears to have meant that some went on long-term loan to the\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.elysee.ch\/index.php?id=169\" target=\"_blank\">Mus\u00e9e de l\u2019Elys\u00e9e<\/a> in Lausanne, Switzerland; some, on the same terms, went to\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.mep-fr.org\/us\/collec.htm\" target=\"_blank\">La Maison Europ\u00e9enne de la Photographie<\/a> in Paris, France; and some returned to the stateside archive. Those lent to La Maison Europ\u00e9enne de la Photographie have apparently been retrieved, while the\u00a0Mus\u00e9e de l\u2019Elys\u00e9e (last I heard) anticipates a demand for the return of what they&#8217;ve held. Both those institutions certainly have documentation of what Polaroid deposited with them, though that likely doesn&#8217;t include any substantive accounting of those works&#8217; original provenance and entry into the Polaroid International Collction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\">But apparently these prints from the International Collection \u2014\u00a0between 4000 and 5000 of them \u2014\u00a0have already gotten factored into the almost 16,000 prints itemized by the vestigial Polaroid Corporation in the inventory presented to the Minnesota Bankruptcy Court as the basis for the projected spring 2010 auction at Sotheby&#8217;s; they do not represent the missing balance of the collection.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\">Presumably (though not assuredly), Polaroid has not cavalierly tossed all of the documentation in the files of the U.S. division related to the deposit of works in the U.S. collection. If relatively intact, those files should contain contracts, letters of agreement, correspondence, and other traces of the collection&#8217;s relationship to the photographers whose works built it.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\">Additionally, in October 2006,\u00a0<a style=\"color: #0909db; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.digitalcamerainfo.com\/content\/Polaroid-Donates-Corporate-Archives-to-Harvard-.htm\" target=\"_blank\">Polaroid donated its corporate archives to the Harvard Business School Baker Library (HBS)<\/a>. These archives include various kinds of images, but are separate from the Polaroid Collection \u2014 although it seems certain that these archives contain documents relating to the collection.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\">In short, there are sources \u2014 beyond what exists within and can be retrieved from the files of the individual photographers involved \u2014 for information about the specific ways in which prints entered the Polaroid Collection(s) and the terms under which the company obtained and made use of them. I think it is incumbent on the Polaroid Corporation to answer some increasingly urgent questions. To wit:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>How does the Polaroid Corporation\u00a0account for the discrepancy between the repeated estimate of 22,000-24,000 prints in the collection, given out by the Polaroid Corporation as recently as summer 2009, and the official inventory of 16,000 presented to the Minnesota court in spring 2009?<\/li>\n<li>Can the Polaroid Corporation\u00a0verify its actual acquisition and legal ownership of all the works it claims as its outright property in the Polaroid Collection, above and beyond authorization from the courts to sell them?<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\">Given the questions that have arisen, I also certainly think it behooves Sotheby&#8217;s to take part in an investigation of the sellers&#8217; bona fides in this situation, so as to assure prospective buyers that anything they purchase at the planned June 2010 sell-off will come with clear provenance and without either actionable encumbrances or the embarrassing ethical baggage of a trail of breach of contract <span style=\"text-decoration: line-through;\">(even if endorsed by negligent bankruptcy courts)<\/span>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\"><strong>Note: At the urging of George H. Singer of the Minneapolis law firm Lindqvist &amp; Vennum, legal counsel to John R. Stoebner, the court-appointed Chapter 7 Trustee in the PBE Corporation bankruptcy proceeding, I hereby revise the above passage as indicated by the strikethrough, and retract the parenthetical phrase &#8220;(even if endorsed by negligent bankruptcy courts).&#8221;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"margin-top: 1em; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; display: block; padding: 0px;\"><strong>Part 2 of <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?p=1923\" target=\"_self\"><strong>1<\/strong><\/a><strong> | 2<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">\u2022<\/p>\n<p>For an index of links to all posts related to this story,\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/?page_id=1232\" target=\"_self\">click here<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I think it is incumbent on the Polaroid Corporation to answer some increasingly urgent questions. To wit: How does the Polaroid Corporation account for the discrepancy between the repeated estimate of 22,000-24,000 prints in the collection, given out by the Polaroid Corporation as recently as summer 2009, and the official inventory of 16,000 presented to the Minnesota court in spring 2009? Can the Polaroid Corporation verify its actual acquisition and legal ownership of all the works it claims as its outright property in the Polaroid Collection, above and beyond authorization from the courts to sell them? [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[64,127,205,263,286,300,320,358,429,430,431,483],"class_list":["post-2262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news-commentary","tag-barbara-hitchcock","tag-corporate-support","tag-george-h-singer","tag-john-r-stoebner","tag-la-maison-europeenne-de-la-photographie","tag-lindqvist-vennum","tag-manfred-heiting","tag-musee-de-lelysee","tag-polaroid","tag-polaroid-collection","tag-polaroid-corporation","tag-sothebys","odd"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2262"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2262\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nearbycafe.com\/artandphoto\/photocritic\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}